top of page
970x250-IAC.jpg
970x250.png
970x250-Rightmove.jpg
Template for national news
No Writer
Dec 3
Jeffrey Epstein's island pictured in 'never-before-seen' images released by House Oversight Committee

Democrats on the House Oversight Committee said on X they were "a harrowing look behind Epstein's closed doors". "We are releasing these photos and videos to ensure public transparency in our investigation and to help piece together the full picture of Epstein's horrific crimes," said representative Robert Garcia. "We won't stop fighting until we deliver justice for the survivors." The images show empty courtyards, bedrooms and other rooms from his villa. Robert Garcia urged President Trump to release "all the files, now". Live updates - Images show Epstein's island Mr Trump previously opposed releasing the files, but last month US Congress overwhelmingly backed the move and the president signed off the bill. The US Department of Justice now has until mid-December to release thousands of documents linked to civil and criminal cases involving Epstein. It could shed more light on the paedophile financier, who socialised with figures including Donald Trump, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and Peter Mandelson. Some details have already been revealed in more than 20,000 other files disclosed last month - but much more is set to follow. The Epstein Files Transparency Act demands release of all files relating to Epstein, including investigations, prosecutions, immunity and plea deals, as well as records connected to Ghislaine Maxwell. Any flight logs and travel records for Epstein's vehicles must also be disclosed, as must individuals named in relation to his criminal activities. Read more:Explainer - What will Epstein files show?What do documents say about Trump, Andrew and Mandelson? Politicians have said the files' release is critical to uncovering whether powerful figures have received special treatment or protection. It is also a response to criticism of a controversial 2008 plea deal in Florida, which allowed Epstein to avoid federal sex trafficking charges and plead guilty to lesser state charges. Epstein killed himself in a prison cell in New York in 2019 but conspiracy theories remain over his death and the people he associated with.

Template for national news
Gemma Peplow, culture and entertainment reporter
Dec 3
Matthew Perry's parents say doctor is 'among most culpable of all' ahead of first sentencing over star's death

Emotional victim impact statements by Perry's mother Suzanne and stepfather Keith Morrison, and father John and stepmother Debbie, have been submitted to the US district court for Central California ahead of Salvador Plasencia's hearing. They say "no one alive and in touch with the world" could have been unaware of the Friends star's struggles with addiction, and that the doctor broke his vows "repeatedly" to "feed on the vulnerability of our son". Plasencia, 44, is the first of five people to be sentenced in connection with the 54-year-old's death, and has pleaded guilty to illegally selling him large amounts of ketamine. He is not accused of selling the dose that killed the actor, but had been supplying the drug to him in the weeks beforehand. Perry was found in his hot tub by his assistant in October 2023. A medical examiner later ruled that ketamine and other factors had caused him to lose consciousness and drown. In their letter filed to the court, Suzanne and Keith Morrison share their grief, saying they feel a "confusion of emotions". Anger "seethes away down deep, whether you want it to or not", they say, detailing how they play out "unalterable events, over and over and over" in their minds, "as if it could make any difference now". They also write about the impact Perry's death has had on others, saying they often find Friends mementos, as well as flowers and notes and other tributes, left at his grave. The star's story "moved so many people", they add. "And he wanted, needed, deserved a third act. It was in the planning. And then, those jackals." 'This doctor conspired to break his most important vows' Saying they find Plasencia's actions "truly hard to understand", they tell the judge: "I believe the man you are going to sentence today is among the most culpable of all... "Why become a doctor? To cure the sick of course. To heal people. To save lives." Crimes can be easier to understand in some circumstances, they say. "Maybe in the heat of passion, or because that person makes one very bad decision… Or some drug dealer, bad to the bone, who takes the calculated risk of getting caught and spending many years in prison. "But… a doctor? Who trades on respect, and trust? And not just one bad decision. No one alive and in touch with the world at all could have been unaware of Matthew's struggles. "But this doctor conspired to break his most important vows, repeatedly, sneaked through the night to meet his victim in secret. For what, a few thousand dollars? So he could feed on the vulnerability of our son." Read more:The drug network exposed by Perry's deathObituary: The one who made everyone laughMatthew Perry: A life in pictures 'You don't deserve to hear our feelings' Addressing Plasencia directly in their statement, John and Debbie Perry say: "You don't deserve to hear our feelings. How you devastated our family contributing to the loss of Matthew, our only son." They describe Perry as a "warm, loving man" and say his recovery counted on Plasencia "saying NO". Their letter continues: "Your motives? I can't imagine. A doctor whose life is devoted to helping people? "How long did you possibly see supplying Matthew countless doses without his death to eventually follow? Did you care? Did you think?" Prosecutors are asking Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett to sentence Plasencia to three years in prison. John and Debbie Perry have asked the court to extend the sentence beyond the mandatory period. Ahead of sentencing, Plasencia's lawyers have described him as a man who rose out of poverty to become a doctor beloved by his patients, and say his selling to Perry was "reckless" and "the biggest mistake of his life". In their sentencing memo, they say "remorse cannot begin to capture the pain, regret and shame that Mr Plasencia feels for the tragedy that unfolded and that he failed to prevent". However, they say Plasencia has already lost his medical licence and career, and a prison sentence is "neither necessary nor warranted". The other four people charged in connection with Perry's death have also accepted plea deals and are due to be sentenced over the next few months. They are: dealer Jasveen Sangha, also known as "the Ketamine Queen", Perry's assistant Kenneth Iwamasa, another doctor, Mark Chavez, and Erik Fleming, an associate of the actor.

Template for national news
Jon Craig, chief political correspondent
Dec 3
Rachel Reeves hit by Labour rural rebellion over inheritance tax on farmers

Speaking during the final day of the Commons debate on the budget, Labour backbenchers demanded a U-turn on the controversial proposals. Plans to introduce a 20% tax on farm estates worth more than £1m from April have drawn protesters to London in their tens of thousands, with many fearing huge tax bills that would force small farms to sell up for good. MPs voted on the so-called "family farms tax" just after 8pm on Tuesday, with dozens of Labour MPs appearing to have abstained, and one backbencher - borders MP Markus Campbell-Savours - voting against, alongside Conservative members. In the vote, the fifth out of seven at the end of the budget debate, Labour's vote slumped from 371 in the first vote on tax changes, down by 44 votes to 327. 'Time to stand up for farmers' The mini-mutiny followed a plea to Labour MPs from the National Farmers Union to abstain. "To Labour MPs: We ask you to abstain on Budget Resolution 50," the NFU urged. "With your help, we can show the government there is still time to get it right on the family farm tax. A policy with such cruel human costs demands change. Now is the time to stand up for the farmers you represent." After the vote, NFU president Tom Bradshaw said: "The MPs who have shown their support are the rural representatives of the Labour Party. They represent the working people of the countryside and have spoken up on behalf of their constituents. "It is vital that the chancellor and prime minister listen to the clear message they have delivered this evening. The next step in the fight against the family farm tax is removing the impact of this unjust and unfair policy on the most vulnerable members of our community." The government comfortably won the vote by 327-182, a majority of 145. But the mini-mutiny served notice to the chancellor and Sir Keir Starmer that newly elected Labour MPs from the shires are prepared to rebel. Speaking in the debate earlier, Mr Campbell-Savours said: "There remain deep concerns about the proposed changes to agricultural property relief (APR). "Changes which leave many, not least elderly farmers, yet to make arrangements to transfer assets, devastated at the impact on their family farms." Samantha Niblett, Labour MP for South Derbyshire abstained after telling MPs: "I do plead with the government to look again at APR inheritance tax. "Most farmers are not wealthy land barons, they live hand to mouth on tiny, sometimes non-existent profit margins. Many were explicitly advised not to hand over their farm to children, (but) now face enormous, unexpected tax bills. "We must acknowledge a difficult truth: we have lost the trust of our farmers, and they deserve our utmost respect, our honesty and our unwavering support." Labour MPs from rural constituencies who did not vote included Tonia Antoniazzi (Gower), Julia Buckley (Shrewsbury), Jonathan Davies (Mid Derbyshire), Maya Ellis (Ribble Valley), and Anna Gelderd (South East Cornwall), Ben Goldsborough (South Norfolk), Alison Hume (Scarborough and Whitby), Terry Jermy (South West Norfolk), Jayne Kirkham (Truro and Falmouth), Noah Law (St Austell and Newquay), Perran Moon, (Camborne and Redruth), Samantha Niblett (South Derbyshire), Jenny Riddell-Carpenter (Suffolk Coastal), Henry Tufnell (Mid and South Pembrokeshire), John Whitby (Derbyshire Dales), Steve Witherden (Montgomeryshire and Glyndwr) and Amanda Hack, (North West Leicestershire).

Template for national news
No Writer
Dec 3
2027 Rugby World Cup: England drawn with Wales in pool stages as Ireland face Scotland and hosts Australia play New Zealand

England were the top-seeded side into Pool F as the third-highest ranked team in the tournament, while Andy Farrell's Ireland were drawn with Scotland for the third successive World Cup, with Uruguay and Portugal completing Pool D. The other headline group is Pool A which sees Australia up against New Zealand, Chile and Hong Kong. Borthwick not in line for new deal yet despite England winning runArgentina lodge official complaint against Tom Curry after Contepomi confrontationAutumn Nations Series 2025: Schedules for England, Ireland, Scotland, WalesGet Sky Sports or stream with no contract on NOW As hosts, Australia were always guaranteed to be in Pool A but being in Band 2 set up a blockbuster clash with the All Blacks. Defending champions South Africa, who are bidding to win a third successive World Cup, are in Pool B with Italy, Georgia and Romania. Pool A: New Zealand, Australia, Chile, Hong KongPool B: South Africa, Italy, Georgia, RomaniaPool C: Argentina, Fiji, Spain, CanadaPool D: Ireland, Scotland, Uruguay, PortugalPool E: France, Japan, USA, SamoaPool F: England, Wales, Tonga, Zimbabwe The Rugby World Cup will take place in Australia and teams were seeded from one to 24 based on their world ranking at the time of the draw before being placed into six pools of four teams. England were in Band 1 alongside South Africa, New Zealand, Ireland, France and Argentina. Australia were in Band 2 with Fiji, Scotland, Italy, Wales and Japan. Band 3 was Georgia, Uruguay, Spain, United States, Chile and Tonga, with Band 4 made up of Samoa, Portugal, Romania, Hong Kong, Zimbabwe and Canada. What is the World Cup format? The simple part of the format is that the top two teams from each pool will progress into the final 16. They will be joined by the four best third-place nations. Then, the top team in Pools A, B, C and D will play a team that finished third.The winners of Pools E and F take on the runners-up from Pools D and B.The runners-up from Pools A and C will face the runners-up from Pools E and F. The tournament takes place in Australia from October 1 to November 13 2027. 'Favourable draw for England' Sky Sports' Michael Cantillon: "All in all, England's draw is a very positive one. "Drawing Wales in their pool may be a headline but they avoided the likes of hosts Australia and Scotland from the same band. "England also landed in one of the most desired pools in E or F - reason being, the pool winners of those two pools avoid other pool winners until the semi-finals. Every other pool winner could face another in the quarters. France were the other fortunate side in this respect. "More good news would fall England's way were they to top their pool as South Africa, New Zealand and France would be on the opposite side of the draw until the final should those three win their pools. "One note of warning: while England's quarter-final is scheduled to be against a pool runner-up, this would be from Pool A, so is likely to be hosts Australia. Borthwick's side are a stronger outfit than the Wallabies, but home advantage could be huge." Townsend: Scotland must beat Ireland before World Cup meeting Gregor Townsend has challenged Scotland to banish their Ireland hoodoo before their showdown at the 2027 World Cup. Scotland have lost their last 11 meetings with the Irish, with their last win coming in the 2017 Six Nations, a few months before Townsend took charge. The winners of Pool D - which also includes the minnows of Uruguay and Portugal - are likely to avoid a formidable round-of-16 clash with France, so the Scotland head coach is aware of the importance of ensuring his team get to a level whereby they feel equipped to get the better of Ireland when they meet Down Under. "It's an easier road to the quarter-finals and semi-finals if you can win your pool," said Townsend, reflecting on the draw at a press conference in Edinburgh. "We'll respect all the three teams that we'll have to face, but obviously Ireland are a team that has beaten us pretty regularly the last few years, so we'll have to be better to beat them. "We have two occasions, one in Dublin, one at Murrayfield before the World Cup. The goal every year is to try and beat Ireland - and the other teams in the Six Nations - but it's even more important now. "It would help massively if we got on the right side of the results for a change. We know how tough it'll be. "Dublin in the last game of the (Six Nations) Championship will be a very difficult game, but we played really well last time we were out there (in 2024) and we'll be doing all we can to win that game. "It'll be more difficult in the World Cup if we haven't managed to beat Ireland in the next two seasons." Ireland coach Andy Farrell claimed the draw made him excited for the tournament. He told a press conference: "You could have put the bet on it being Scotland couldn't you? It's a great fixture, they know each other well. "I was super-excited actually, got the old hairs on the skin standing up - that's the way it should be." "I back myself and the rest of the coaches and the players to go as far as we'd all hope. We have the ambition to win a World Cup, otherwise what's the point?"

Template for national news
No Writer
Dec 3
Nursery worker, 45, pleads guilty to 26 sexual offences against children

Vincent Chan, 45, of Finchley, worked at a nursery in north London between 2017 and 2024. The offences include five counts of sexual assault of a child by penetration, four counts of sexual assault of a child by touching, 11 counts of taking indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs of a child, and six counts of making indecent photographs or pseudo-photographs of a child. The latter offences involved images across categories A, B, and C, with category A depicting the most severe abuse. Chan will be sentenced at Wood Green Crown Court on 23 January. The Met said this was one of its most harrowing and complex child sexual abuse investigations. Chan was unmasked as a paedophile after a nursery staff member reported that he had callously filmed a child falling asleep in their food with a nursery-issued device and set it to music for "comedic purposes" before sharing the video with his colleagues, the force said in a statement. He was subsequently arrested in June 2024 on suspicion of neglect and officers seized 25 digital devices from his home and three from the nursery. Chan was released on bail, but lost his job at the nursery. Three months later, his devices were submitted for analysis by police, which was completed in July 2025. Forensic teams found substantial amounts of indecent images and videos of children, including evidence of contact sexual offences against children, according to the police statement. Chan was arrested in September this year on suspicion of sexual offences. Officers seized another 26 devices from his home as well as 15 from the nursery, a since-closed branch of Bright Horizons in West Hampstead. Detective Superintendent Lewis Basford, who led the Met's investigation, said: "Child sexual abuse is one of the most horrific crimes imaginable, and Chan’s offending spanned years, revealing a calculated and predatory pattern of abuse. "He infiltrated environments that should have been safe havens for children, exploiting the trust of families and the wider community to conceal his actions and prey on the most vulnerable." DCI Basford added: "We recognise the member of staff who raised their concerns, as without that first report of child cruelty, Chan's abuse could have continued unchecked, putting countless more children at risk." At this time, police identified four children as Chan's victims. The families of the victims have been contacted directly and are receiving specialist support, while the NSPCC is running a helpline for all 700 families of children who attended the nursery during the time Chan worked there between 2017 and 2024. In a statement issued through legal firm Leigh Day, some of the families affected said: "As parents, we are still trying to process the sickening discovery that our children were subjected to despicable abuse by Vincent Chan at the nursery. "We trust the judge to pass the strongest sentence to fit the crimes Vincent Chan has committed against young children, innocent victims who could not fight back." Read more from Sky News:Pictured: Girl killed in children's birthday party shootingDecade of county lines leaves its scars on children A spokesperson for the nursery said following Chan's guilty pleas: "This individual's actions represent not only a violation of the victims, but also a profound betrayal of the trust placed in him by families and colleagues." They said the company has extensive safeguarding practices in place, including rigorous vetting and DBS criminal record checks. The company has commissioned an external expert in the field to undertake a full review of its safeguarding practices after Chan "was able to commit these crimes despite our safeguarding measures", the nursery spokesperson said. Anyone who wants to make a report to police about Chan can contact OpLanark@met.police.uk, or call 101 from within the UK, quoting the reference CAD3697/1DEC.

Template for national news
No Writer
Dec 3
Sabrina Carpenter hits out at 'evil and disgusting' White House video featuring her song

"Do not ever involve me or my music to benefit your inhumane agenda," the pop star posted on X. The White House used part of Carpenter's upbeat song Juno over pictures of immigration agents handcuffing, chasing and detaining people. It was posted on social media on Monday and has been viewed 1.2 million times so far. President Trump's policy of sending officers into communities to forcibly round up illegal immigrants has proved controversial, with protests and legal challenges ongoing. Mr Trump promised the biggest deportation in US history, but some of those detained have been living and working in the US for decades and have no criminal record. Carpenter is not the only star to express disgust over the administration's use of their music. Olivia Rodrigo last month warned the White House not to "ever use my songs to promote your racist, hateful propaganda" after All-American Bitch was used in a video urging undocumented migrants to leave voluntarily. Read more from Sky News:Pope urges Trump not to oust Venezuelan president by forceGovernment delays Chinese 'super embassy' decision In July, English singer Jess Glynne also said she felt "sick" when her song from the viral Jet2 advert was used over footage of people in handcuffs being loaded on a plane.Other artists have also previously hit out at Trump officials for using their music at political campaign events, including Guns N' Roses, Foo Fighters, Celine Dion, Ozzy Osbourne and The Rolling Stones.

Template for national news
Deborah Haynes, security and defence editor
Dec 3
The Wargame: Inside the decades-long saga that's left UK shockingly unprepared for war

With Sir Keir Starmer under pressure to accelerate plans to reverse the decline, two new episodes of Sky News and Tortoise's podcast series The Wargame uncover what happened behind the scenes as Britain switched funding away from warfare and into peacetime priorities such as health and welfare after the Soviet Union collapsed. 👉Search for The Wargame on your podcast app👈 This decades-long saga, spanning multiple Labour, Conservative and coalition governments, includes heated rows between the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and the Treasury, threats to resign, and dire warnings of weakness. It also exposes a failure by the military and civil service to spend Britain's still-significant defence budget effectively, further compounding the erosion of fighting power. 'Russia knew' about UK's weaknesses Now, with the threat from Russia returning, there is a concern the UK has been left to bluff about its ability to respond, rather than pivot decisively back to a war footing. "We've been living on a sort of mirage for so long," says Sir Ben Wallace, a Conservative defence secretary from 2019 until 2023. "As long as Trooping the Colour was happening, and the Red Arrows flew, and prime ministers could pose at NATO, everything was fine. "But it wasn't fine. And the people who knew it wasn't fine were actually the Americans, but also the Russians." Not enough troops, medics, or ammo Lord George Robertson, a Labour defence secretary from 1997 to 1999 and the lead author of a major defence review this year, says when he most recently "lifted the bonnet" to look at the state of the Army, Royal Navy and Royal Air Force, he found "we were really unprepared". "We don't have enough ammunition, we don't have enough logistics, we don't have enough trained soldiers, the training is not right, and we don't have enough medics to take the casualties that would be involved in a full-scale war." Asked if the situation was worse than he had imagined, Lord Robertson says: "Much worse." 'I was shocked,' says ex-defence secretary Sir Gavin Williamson, a former Conservative defence secretary, says he too had been "quite shocked as to how thin things were" when he was in charge at the MoD between 2017 and 2019. "There was this sort of sense of: 'Oh, the MoD is always good for a billion [pounds] from Treasury - you can always take a billion out of the MoD and nothing will really change.' "And maybe that had been the case in the past, but the cupboards were really bare. "You were just taking the cupboards." But Lord Philip Hammond, a Conservative defence secretary from 2011 to 2014 and chancellor from 2016 until 2019, appears less sympathetic to the cries for increased cash. "Gavin Williamson came in [to the Ministry of Defence], the military polished up their bleeding stumps as best they could and convinced him that the UK's defence capability was about to collapse," he says. "He came scuttling across the road to Downing Street to say, I need billions of pounds more money… To be honest, I didn't think that he had sufficiently interrogated the military begging bowls that had been presented to him." What to expect from The Wargame's return Episodes one to five of The Wargame simulate a Russian attack on the UK and imagine what might happen, with former politicians and military chiefs back in the hot seat. The drama reveals how vulnerable the country has really become to an attack on the home front. The two new episodes seek to find out why. The story of the UK's hollowed-out defences starts in a different era when an Iron Curtain divided Europe, Ronald Reagan was president of the US, and an Iron Lady was in power in Britain. Sir Malcolm Rifkind, who went on to serve as defence secretary between 1992 and 1995 under John Major, recalls his time as minister for state at the Foreign Office in 1984. In December of that year, then prime minister Margaret Thatcher agreed to host a relatively unknown member of the Soviet Communist Party Politburo called Mikhail Gorbachev, who subsequently became the last leader of the Soviet Union. Sir Malcolm remembers how Mrs Thatcher emerged from the meeting to say: "I think Mr Gorbachev is a man with whom we can do business." It was an opinion she shared with her close ally, the US president. Sir Malcolm says: "Reagan would have said, 'I'm not going to speak to some unknown communist in the Politburo'. But if the Iron Lady, who Reagan thought very highly of, says he's worth talking to, he must be worth it. We'd better get in touch with this guy. Which they did. "And I'm oversimplifying it, but that led to the Cold War ending without a shot being fired." Read more from Sky News:Courts in 'calamitous' stateReeves faces rural Labour rebellion In the years that followed, the UK and  much of the rest of Europe reaped a so-called peace dividend, cutting defence budgets, shrinking militaries and reducing wider readiness for war. Into this different era stepped Tony Blair as Labour's first post-Cold War prime minister, with Lord Robertson as his defence secretary. Lord Robertson reveals the threat he and his ministerial team secretly made to protect their budget from then chancellor Gordon Brown amid a sweeping review of defence, which was meant to be shaped by foreign policy, not financial envelopes. "I don't think I've ever said this in public before, but John Reid, who was the minister for the Armed Forces, and John Speller, who was one of the junior ministers in the department, the three of us went to see Tony Blair late at night - he was wearing a tracksuit, we always remember - and we said that if the money was taken out of our budget, the budget that was based on the foreign policy baseline, then we would have to resign," Lord Robertson says. "We obviously didn't resign - but we kept the money." The podcast hears from three other Labour defence secretaries: Geoff Hoon, Lord John Hutton and the current incumbent, John Healey. For the Conservatives, as well as Rifkind, Hammond, Williamson and Wallace, there are interviews with Sir Liam Fox, Sir Michael Fallon, Dame Penny Mordaunt and Sir Grant Shapps. In addition, military commanders have their say, with recollections from Field Marshal Lord David Richards, who was chief of the defence staff from 2010 until 2013, General Sir Nick Carter, who led the armed forces from 2018 until 2021, and Vice Admiral Sir Nick Hine, who was second in charge of the navy from 2019 until 2022. 'We cut too far' At one point, Sir Grant, who held a variety of cabinet roles, including defence secretary, is asked whether he regrets the decisions the Conservative government took when in power. He says: "Yes, I think it did cut defence too far. I mean, I'll just be completely black and white about it." Lord Robertson says Labour too shares some responsibility: "Everyone took the peace dividend right through." Building on the success of the highly acclaimed podcast The Wargame, Sky News presents The Wargame: Decoded - a one-off live event that takes you deep inside the minds of the wargame’s participants. Discover how they tackled the toughest challenges, the decisions they made under intense pressure, and even experience key moments of the game for yourself. Click here to get tickets. Sky News’ Deborah Haynes will guide the conversation with Sir Ben Wallace, Robert Johnson, Jack Straw, Amber Rudd, Keir Giles and General Sir Richard Barrons - real-life military chiefs, former government officials and leading experts. Together, they will unpack their experiences inside The Wargame, revealing the uncertainty, moral dilemmas and real-world pressures faced by those who must make decisions when the nation is under threat. Join us for this unique event exploring how the UK might respond in a moment of national crisis and get a rare, unfiltered glimpse into how prepared the country truly is for war.

Template for national news
No Writer
Dec 3
Formula 1 title race: How McLaren mistakes helped Max Verstappen earn unlikely chance in battle with Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri

Verstappen was also 70 points back from Piastri's team-mate Lando Norris, who would have completed a dominant McLaren one-two in Zandvoort had it not been for a late technical failure that forced him to retire from the race. Second place for Verstappen at his home race represented just his second podium during an eight-race winless streak, during which Christian Horner had been sacked as Red Bull team principal and replaced by Laurent Mekies. F1 title permutations for three-way Abu Dhabi GP deciderWhen to watch Abu Dhabi GP on Sky | F1 championship standingsDownload the Sky Sports app for expert analysis, best video & more📱Not got Sky? Get Sky Sports or stream with no contract on NOW📺 Not only did Verstappen have a huge deficit to overcome with nine rounds remaining, but his Red Bull team appeared to have no answer to McLaren's pace. Fast forward three months, and Verstappen is heading into the final round of the season in Abu Dhabi with a legitimate chance of extending his title streak. He has remarkably scored 108 more points than Piastri across the last eight rounds to sit ahead of the Australian, but trails leader Norris by 12 points going into this weekend's decider in the desert. While there has been an impressive upturn in Red Bull's performance, without poor execution by McLaren during the run-in, the door would have already been shut on Verstappen's title aspirations. How Red Bull got back on track The season seemed to be spiralling out of control for Red Bull when Verstappen endured his worst weekend of the season - at least in terms of pace - at the final round before the summer break in Hungary, qualifying eighth and finishing the race in ninth. Zandvoort represented a notable improvement following the break but Verstappen was still powerless to challenge the McLarens, albeit ultimately finishing second as a result of Norris' misfortune. The turning point came as Red Bull brought a significant floor upgrade to the Italian Grand Prix, which would enable Verstappen to take pole position and victory in Monza before repeating the feat next time out in Azerbaijan. Since the Monza upgrade, Verstappen has finished on the podium in eight successive races and claimed four victories. Much of the toxicity that had plagued the team during the latter stages of Horner's tenure, which it should be said the long-time chief wasn't exclusively responsible for, seemed to dissipate under Mekies' leadership. While they've still been unable to get many points out of Yuki Tsunoda on the other side of the garage, both Verstappen and the team have been superb during his late-season surge. Baku blunders give Verstappen hope Significant mistakes from McLaren and their drivers, Piastri in particular, had been few and far between over the first two thirds of the season. It therefore came as a huge surprise when Piastri crashed out of both qualifying and the race on the streets of Baku. Some theorised that the Australian's confidence or concentration could have been shaken by McLaren instructing him to give second place back to Norris a round earlier in Italy after the Brit had lost time during a slow pit stop. Regardless of what caused the errors, they prompted a spectacular loss of form which would see him go six races without a podium. Norris was guilty of not taking full advantage of Piastri's errors, as failing to ace a crucial final lap in qualifying left him seventh on the grid, before a couple of sloppy moments during the race meant he had failed to improve his position by the chequered flag. Verstappen was clinical and made big gains on both McLarens to give himself a flicker of hope. Piastri causes Austin collision after 'repercussions' fiasco Tensions were heightened at McLaren after Norris barged past Piastri on the first lap of the Singapore Grand Prix to take third place, with their positions remaining unchanged at the end of the race. Following complaints from Piastri on the radio at the time, McLaren bosses Zak Brown and Andrea Stella initially said they had viewed the contact as a racing incident, but two weeks later at the United States Grand Prix, Norris announced he would be facing repercussions enforced by the team. It became apparent that the repercussions were to give Piastri priority in terms of choosing whether to run before or after Norris in the crucial closing stages of qualifying sessions. The situation dominated the build-up to the Sprint weekend in Austin as the media tried to work out what that the unspecified 'repercussions' were. They ultimately didn't last long as Piastri made a reckless move at the start of the Sprint race which took both him and Norris out, after which McLaren confirmed they were restoring a level-playing field. Verstappen won the Sprint to make eight points on both McLaren drivers, but their first-corner exit also meant the team were unable to gather crucial data from the Sprint to inform their decisions for the rest of the weekend. Norris qualified and finished the race in second, while Piastri could only manage fifth after qualifying sixth, which meant Verstappen was within 40 points of the lead with five rounds remaining. Vegas double disqualification hands Verstappen lifeline Norris had reduced what was a 34-point deficit to Piastri to 14 points, and the Brit then produced perhaps his two best weekends of the season to take control of the title battle. He took pole and victory at the Mexico City Grand Prix to retake the championship lead for the first time since April, and then won the Sao Paulo Sprint as Piastri slightly unfortunately crashed out, before following it up with another pole and win to surge clear. Despite delivering a thrilling comeback drive from a pit-lane start to finish third in Brazil, Verstappen trailed Norris by 49 points after the Interlagos weekend and said he could "forget about" winning the title with only the season-ending triple header remaining. Norris appeared to have put himself right on the brink of sealing his maiden championship when he finished second behind Verstappen in second in Las Vegas, but the Dutchman's hopes would be dramatically reignited hours after the chequered flag when both McLarens were disqualified for having breached the limit for plank wear during the race. Making 25 points on each of the McLarens drew Verstappen level with Piastri 24 points behind Norris with just two rounds remaining in Qatar and Abu Dhabi. The disqualification actually represented something of a reprieve for Piastri as he avoided losing six further points to Norris. A setup misjudgement from McLaren led to extreme bouncing during the race, with the blunder all the more painful for Norris given the position of strength he had established. Poor strategy call hurts Piastri as Norris wobbles The Qatar Grand Prix offered Norris his first opportunity to seal a maiden title, but the weekend didn't go to plan for the Brit. It was Piastri who finally rediscovered his form to take pole and victory in the last Sprint sessions of the season, with Norris having to settle for third in both, with Verstappen fourth. Norris enabled Piastri to take pole for the main race as he blew his final flying lap in qualifying but was still reasonably well placed in second on the grid ahead of Verstappen. Too much wheel spin in the second phase of Norris' start allowed Verstappen to snatch second, but the key moment of the race was still to come. With a one-off limit in place on how many laps each tyre set could be used for due to fears over possible punctures, each driver was going to be required to make two pit stops during the race so long as there weren't any red flags, which there weren't. Therefore when a Safety Car was sent out after a midfield collision on lap seven after with exactly 50 laps remaining, almost all the strategists in the pit lane saw it as a no-brainer to take advantage of the minimised time loss and lock themselves into two 25-lap stints with another stop on lap 32 to take them to the end of the race. McLaren chose not to stop either then-leader Piastri or Norris, and would later cite a desire to retain strategic flexibility and avoid the risk of coming out in traffic had some cars behind not pitted under the Safety Car. Stella would admit concern over Norris being further penalised by having to wait in a possible double stack of the McLarens was a factor in the decision, but not the main one. Whatever the reason was, the lack of any further Safety Car interruptions during the race meant the decision turned out to be a bad one. Piastri valiantly attempted to chase Verstappen down but had to settle for second, while an out of sorts Norris appeared destined to finish fifth until an error from Mercedes' Kimi Antonelli on the penultimate lap allowed the Brit through to fourth and to claim two additional crucial championship points. That moment ensured Norris will remain a very clear favourite going into the final weekend of the season, with a 12-point lead over Verstappen while Piastri sits four points further back, but McLaren's autumn blunders have opened the door to what would rank as the greatest comeback in the sport's history. The 2025 Formula 1 season concludes with the title-deciding Abu Dhabi Grand Prix live on Sky Sports F1 from Friday. Stream Sky Sports with NOW - no contract, cancel anytime

bottom of page